BR 01-92 "Automatic"
by Bell & Ross
|
|
|
| |
|
Watch Magazine Editor |
|
| |
Aunque muy poca gente sabe quien está detrás de esta marca y donde fabrica sus relojes, Bell & Ross sigue fiel a su estilo “vintage” que tanto tirón tiene en el mercado actual. El "BR-01" simboliza a la perfección esta filosofía.  |
Fashion/Life Style Editor |
| |
|
Aficionado |
| |
I love cockpit instruments, I've got a clock. But on your wrist – nah? Might have worked better smaller. |
Collector |
| |
A design exercise. It's like a PVD-coated Sinn inside a strange square. Ubiquitous ETA inside, so nothing new at this point. I prefer PVD, with its more military lookalike watches. I find the watch strange for my taste. At least the price is honest... |
Watch Magazine Journalist |
| |
In an ascending progression, the brand is forging itself a niche in a very specific market. What remains unclear is, Who will wear this "box" on their wrist? |
Forum Moderator |
| |
It's like putting a strap on Sinn's Navigation Borduhr: absolute nonsense. |
Industry Writer |
| |
A cute gimmick, useful if you have no idea what to do with more traditional watches, have to stay within a lower band width of pricing, and are brain
dead with no philosophy of watchmaking except what the marketing department can dish up for you. Opens up the great potential for a series such as 'famous aircraft of WWII' or the more down to earth 'clocks from famous tank divisions'. If successful, you could even make a series for each country, based on themes of famous fighting machines used in major battles (of course only the ones that each particular country actually won). What will the commercial guys at B&R think of next? |
Dealer/Jeweler |
| |
|
Rep |
| |
Poor performance, don't like it. |
Importer |
| |
Wonderful instrument to be placed in a dashboard or over your work table. Impossible for an average human being to fit it on the wrist. I like big watches, but 46 x 46 is a bit too much. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |